LexisNexis®
University

Joint Representations: Privilege, Conflicts, and Other Ethical Traps

Content Provider
American Law Institute CLE
Product
CLE
Run Time
65 Minutes
Recording Date
01/17/2024
Presenter(s)
Mark J. Fucile, Peter R. Jarvis
Learning Method
On-Demand Training
Practice Area
Ethics
Persona
CLE OnDemand

Price $219.00

Add To CartCheckout

Description

Lawyers often get asked to represent multiple parties in the same matter. Joint representation of related parties – such as business partners, family members, or work colleagues – might allow for cost savings and certain efficiencies, but can also involve a number of potentially complex legal issues – especially ethical ones! This practical program will explain how to assess and resolve the risks that commonly arise in joint representations, including the essential determination of whether you can competently represent both parties. Learn how to identify and manage potential conflicts early on, address privilege and confidentiality issues, and resolve disagreements among your clients. In just one hour, the faculty – composed of two highly experienced professional responsibility lawyers – will explore how to: - Explain joint representation to clients - Structure joint representation to avoid conflicts - Utilize the joint defense privilege and other confidentiality and privilege issues - Assess when positions are “adverse” for conflict purposes - Understand what happens when conflicts develop - Apply the aggregate settlement rule

Literature

State Status Total Credits Type Of Credit Approved Thru
AlabamaApproved1.00Ethics12/31/2024
AlaskaApproved1.00EthicsOn-going
ArizonaApproved1.00EthicsOn-going
ArkansasApproved1.00EthicsOn-going
CaliforniaApproved1.00Ethics01/17/2029
ColoradoApproved1.00Ethics12/31/2026
ConnecticutApproved1.00EthicsOn-going
DelawareApproved1.10Ethics01/16/2026
FloridaApproved1.50General or Ethics10/31/2025
GeorgiaApproved1.00Ethics12/31/2024
HawaiiApproved1.00Ethics01/17/2026
IdahoPending State Response0.00
IllinoisApproved1.00Ethics03/12/2026
IndianaApproved1.00Ethics04/18/2025
IowaApproved1.00Ethics01/16/2025
KansasApproved1.00Ethics03/31/2025
KentuckyApproved1.00Ethics06/30/2024
LouisianaApproved1.08Ethics03/12/2025
MainePending State Response0.00
MinnesotaApproved1.00Ethics03/21/2026
MississippiApproved1.10Ethics03/12/2025
MissouriApproved1.30GeneralOn-going
MontanaApproved1.00Ethics01/17/2027
NebraskaPending State Response0.00
NevadaApproved1.00Ethics12/31/2027
New HampshireApproved1.00Ethics01/16/2027
New JerseyApproved1.00EthicsOn-going
New MexicoApproved1.00Ethics01/16/2029
New YorkApproved1.00EthicsOn-going
North CarolinaPending State Response0.00
North DakotaApproved1.00Ethics01/17/2027
OhioApproved1.00Professional Conduct12/31/2024
OregonApproved1.00Ethics01/16/2027
PennsylvaniaApproved1.00Ethics03/12/2026
Rhode IslandApproved1.00Ethics06/30/2024
South CarolinaApproved1.08Ethics12/31/2024
TennesseeApproved1.08Ethics03/12/2025
TexasApproved1.00Ethics03/28/2025
UtahApproved1.00Ethics12/31/2024
VermontApproved1.00EthicsOn-going
VirginiaApproved1.00General10/31/2024
West VirginiaApproved1.30EthicsOn-going
WisconsinApproved1.00GeneralOn-going
WyomingApproved1.00Ethics03/12/2025

Speakers