SAN FRANCISCO - A California man failed to present his invasion of privacy class suit against a security system provider in a sufficient manner in which to survive a summary judgment motion; however, he should be given a chance to amend his complaint, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Jan. 17, remanding the case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (John Faulkner, et al. v. ADT Security Services, Inc., et al., No. 11-16233, 9th Cir.; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 1108).